Abstract
The domestic manifestation of the War on Terror has produced the most difficult and sustained set of controversies regarding the limits on First Amendment protections for political speech and association since the anti-Communist crusades of the Red Scare and McCarthy eras. An examination of the types of domestic terrorism prosecutions that have become common since the September 11 attacks reveals continuing, unresolved conflicts between national security needs and traditional protections for speech and (especially) associational freedoms.
Recommended Citation
Ashutosh Bhagwat,
Terrorism and Associations,
63
Emory L. J.
581
(2014).
Available at:
https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol63/iss3/2
COinS