Author ORCID Identifier
0000-0003-4748-501X
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2023
Keywords
Freedom from addiction, Use disorders, Fundamental liberty interest, U.S. Constitution, Subordinated groups, Constitutional rights, Addictive technology, Threats to freedom of thought, State lotteries
Abstract
This Article explores the interaction between addiction and liberty and identifies a firm legal basis for recognition of a fundamental constitutional right to freedom from addiction. Government interferes with freedom from addiction when it causes addiction or restricts addiction treatment, and government may protect freedom from addiction through legislation empowering individuals against private actors’ efforts to addict them without their consent. This Article motivates and tests the boundaries of this right through case studies of emergent threats to liberty made possible or exacerbated by new technologies and scientific understandings. These include certain state lottery programs, addiction treatment restrictions, and smartphone applications.
The right to freedom from addiction is supported by the nation’s history and tradition. In addition to addressing emergent threats to the freedom of thought, the right links together longstanding aspects of constitutional law assumed to be sui generis, including longstanding (until the 1970s) constitutional prohibitions on state lotteries, the exemption of gambling from direct First Amendment protection, and heightened state interests in controlling addictive drugs. The right to freedom from addiction is also an antisubordinating liberty because it connects the historically marginalized interests of people with substance use and gambling disorders with the increasingly mainstream movement to regulate big tech.
First Page
259
Publication Title
Cornell Law Review
Recommended Citation
Matthew B. Lawrence, Addiction and Liberty, 108 CORNELL L.R. 259 (2023).
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Fourteenth Amendment Commons, Gaming Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Medicine and Health Commons, Other Medical Specialties Commons, Other Psychology Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons