Author ORCID Identifier

Christopher Buccafusco 0000-0003-4501-7386

David Fagundes 0000-0003-1795-7143

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2016

Keywords

Unauthorized use, Copyright, Moral foundations theory, Attribution, Infringement

Abstract

This Article presents a novel view of the complex moral psychology of infringement. It does so both to complement extant critiques of copyright’s incentivist story and to provide a realistic account of owners’ motivations for infringement on which a more effective copyright regime may be built. We elaborate these claims as follows. Part I highlights the contrast between the robust critiques of copyright’s theory of creation and the paucity of attention to its theory of litigation, and illustrates the social costs produced by increasingly common infringement suits animated by nonfinancial concerns. Part II develops a psychology of infringement, rooted in MFT, that illuminates the plural motivations—including, but ranging far beyond, pecuniary harm—that underlie owners’ decisions to sue (or threats to do so). Part III elaborates the implications of our analysis. We first show how our claims forge a middle path that mediates between the traditionally opposed copyright paradigms of market-focused utilitarianism and moral rights. Second, we identify a series of policy levers that lawmakers could employ to reform copyright law in a way that is both mindful of the realities of owners’ moral psychology and still true to copyright’s goals of optimizing creative production. Finally, the Conclusion reflects on possibilities for future work framed by our analysis, such as empirical research that would further shed light on copyright owners’ subjective experience of infringement.

First Page

2433

Publication Title

Minnesota Law Review

Comments

Copyright © 2016 by Christopher Buccafusco & David Fagundes.

Share

COinS