Author ORCID Identifier
Kevin Quinn 0000-0002-2919-721X
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2010
Keywords
Court-packing, Supreme Court, New Deal Court, Conservatism, Liberalism, Franklin Roosevelt, Voting patterns, Owen Roberts
Abstract
Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s court-packing plan of 1937 and the “switch in time that saved nine” animate central questions of law, politics, and history. Did Supreme Court Justice Roberts abruptly switch votes in 1937 to avert a showdown with Roosevelt? Scholars disagree vigorously about whether Roberts’s transformation was gradual and anticipated or abrupt and unexpected. Using newly collected data of votes from the 1931–1940 terms, we contribute to the historical understanding of this episode by providing the first quantitative evidence of Roberts’s transformation. Applying modern measurement methods, we show that Roberts shifted sharply to the left in the 1936 term. The shift appears sudden and temporary. The duration of Roberts’s shift, however, is in many ways irrelevant, as the long-term transformation of the Court is overwhelmingly attributable to Roosevelt’s appointees.
First Page
69
Publication Title
Journal of Legal Analysis
Recommended Citation
Daniel E. Ho & Kevin M. Quinn, Did a Switch in Time Save Nine?, 2 J. Legal Analysis 69 (2010).
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Models and Methods Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons