Author ORCID Identifier
Tonja Jacobi 0000-0002-5200-5765
Certiorari, Supreme Court, Salience, Discretion, Doctrinal change, Ideology, Lower courts
How does the Supreme Court choose among cases to grant cert? In a model with a strategic Supreme Court, a continuum of rule-following lower courts, a set of potential cases for revision, and a distribution of future lower court cases, we show that the Court takes the case that will most significantly shape future lower court case outcomes in the direction that the Court prefers. That is, the Court grants cert to the case with maximum salience. If the Court is rather liberal (or conservative), then the most salient case is that which moves the discretionary range of the legal standard as far left (or right) as possible. But if the Court is moderate, then the most salient case will be a function of the skewedness of the distribution of ideologies of the lower courts and the likelihood that future cases will fall within the adjusted discretionary range. The extent of the political alignment of lower courts affects not only substantive lawmaking by the Supreme Court but also the earlier decision of whether to grant a given case cert to begin with.
Supreme Court Economic Review
Álvaro Bustos & Tonja Jacobi, Judicial Choice among Cases for Certiorari, 27 SUP. CT. ECON. REV. 117 (2019).
Courts Commons, Judges Commons, Models and Methods Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons
© 2019 by the University of Chicago. All rights reserved.